One of my favorite scenes in C.S. Lewis’s novel The Great Divorce involves quite the trio: a ghost, a lizard, and an angel. The little red Lizard sits upon the Ghost’s shoulders, perfectly positioned to whisper in his ear. The Ghost, who is living between heaven and hell, still has a chance to enter the... Continue Reading →
Rebutting Freud: Do People Believe Simply to Relieve Doubt and Fear?
Over the last few centuries, there have been some powerhouse intellectual figures who have thrown their weight against the Christian faith. Whether Voltaire, Hume, Nietzsche, Marx, Darwin, or Russel, many have brought various charges against Christianity. Of course, not to be forgotten is the great psychologist Sigmund Freud. One of Freud’s primary themes was that... Continue Reading →
Christus Victor Through Penal Substitution
All too often in theology, different concepts or aspects of an idea are pitted against one another, as if they could not be mutually compatible. One area that this is prone to occur is when discussing the atonement. The English word ‘atonement’ derives comes from the phrase, ‘At-One-Ment,’ with reference to reconciling parties that were... Continue Reading →
My Top 5 Nonfiction Books of 2025
It is important, critical really, to seek to read more books well, rather than to merely read more books. Too often, we readers can be so focused on breaking our reading records, that we fail to slow down and let the reading we’ve done do its work. Reflection. Study. Writing. Rereading. All these are best... Continue Reading →
The Danger of a Familiar Gospel
It’s a strange world we live in when one of the most infamous atheists, Richard Dawkins, is calling himself a “cultural Christian.” Of course, he’s still an atheist, but nevertheless, there has been a palpable shift in the West’s intellectual atmosphere for Dawkins (and others) to be willing to embrace such an identity. And yet,... Continue Reading →
Humanism or Christianity: Which Offers a Better Way for Critiquing Evil Actions in Christian History?
The fact is, that the best foundation for a moral critique of evil actions committed in the name of Christ lay not in a vague notion of humanist sentimentality, but in the active reign of Jesus Christ as King.